C# ISTRUCTURALEQUATABLE NERELERDE KULLANıLıYOR SıRLARı

C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor Sırları

C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor Sırları

Blog Article

Is Légal’s reported “psychological trick” considered fair play or unacceptable conduct under FIDE rules?

Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.

This is really amazing code and works great for .Kemiksiz Standard libraries. If you are in a .Kemiksiz Core 2.1 application there is an even cooler way of doing this:

Daniel A.A. PelsmaekerDaniel A.A. Pelsmaeker 49.2k2121 gold badges112112 silver badges160160 bronze badges 5 In addition to answers which point to duplicate hashcodes birli is documented behavior, some reasoning and reflection would also lead you to the same conclusion.

I'm amazed that the most important reason is derece mentioned here. IEquatable was introduced mainly for structs for two reasons:

The generic tuple classes (Tuple, Tuple, Tuple, and so on) and the Array class provide explicit implementations of the IStructuralEquatable interface. By casting (in C#) or converting (in Visual Basic) the current instance of an array or tuple to an IStructuralEquatable interface value and providing your IEqualityComparer implementation bey an argument to the Equals method, you can define a custom equality comparison for the array or collection.

What does IEquatable buy you, exactly? The only reason I can see it being useful is when creating a generic type C# IStructuralEquatable nedir and forcing users to implement and write a good equals method.

The following example creates two identical 3-tuple objects whose components consist of three Double values. The value of the second component is Double.NaN. The example then calls the Tuple.Equals method, and it calls the IStructuralEquatable.Equals method three times. The first time, it passes the default equality comparer that is returned by the EqualityComparer.

Ray BooysenRay Booysen 29.6k1414 gold badges8686 silver badges111111 bronze badges 6 so when you are dealing with objects, is == assumed to only mean the exact same memory address (same instance)

If you read this entire post and are thinking wow that is a lot of code and steps to remember then do hamiş fear because Dustin told me and showed me that Visual Studio will generate all of this for you!!!!! Check this out:

To achieve this, employee objects with matching SSN properties would be treated birli logically equal, even if they were derece structurally equal. Share Improve this answer Follow

That is, you can create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface. The interface katışıksız two members: Equals, which tests for equality by using a specified IEqualityComparer implementation, and GetHashCode, which returns identical hash codes for objects that are equal.

The IStructuralEquatable interface supports only custom comparisons for structural equality. The IStructuralComparable interface supports custom structural comparisons for sorting and ordering.

Bu alanda veya gayrı bir alanda, benim ve öbür yardımcı insanların paylaşımlarına lütfen acizliğiniz ve ezikliğinizle yaklaşmayınız. İzin istemek, benim hükmüm şeşna girmeniz anlamına gelmemektedir.

Report this page